Integrasi Generative AI dalam Transformasi Pedagogi Tari: Studi Eksploratif Penggunaan Google Gemini sebagai Tutor
Downloads
Perkembangan kecerdasan buatan generatif, seperti Google Gemini, telah membuka peluang baru dalam transformasi pedagogi seni, termasuk dalam pembelajaran tari yang selama ini sangat bergantung pada interaksi fisik langsung dengan instruktur. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi integrasi Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), khususnya Google Gemini, dalam transformasi pedagogi tari di era digital. Fokus utama studi ini adalah menganalisis potensi Google Gemini sebagai tutor virtual yang mampu menyediakan instruksi kinestetik, deskripsi gerakan, dan struktur koreografi secara mandiri. Menggunakan metode studi eksploratif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, data dikumpulkan melalui observasi interaksi prompt-to-movement dan analisis konten terhadap akurasi deskripsi gerak yang dihasilkan AI. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Google Gemini efektif dalam memfasilitasi pemahaman konseptual dan memberikan stimulus kreatif bagi pembelajar tari, terutama dalam aspek pemecahan struktur gerak dan penyediaan scaffolding instruksional. Namun, AI ini masih memerlukan validasi fisik dari instruktur manusia untuk detail teknis yang bersifat kompleks dan aspek estetika-emosional (rasa) yang tidak dapat diobjektifikasi secara tekstual. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Google Gemini tidak menggantikan peran pendidik, melainkan berfungsi sebagai asisten pedagogis yang memperluas aksesibilitas literasi tari, dengan catatan bahwa supervisi manusia tetap diperlukan untuk menjamin keutuhan nilai artistik dan filosofis dalam pembelajaran tari tradisional.
An, D., & Youn, N. (2018). The inspirational power of arts on creativity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.025
Baverly, J., & Higgins, L. (2023). Generative AI as a catalyst for creative choreography: Opportunities and limitations. Journal of Dance Education & Technology, 12(2), 45–59.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Castillo-Vergara, M., Galleguillos, N. B., Cuello, L. J., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005
Degli Innocenti, E., Geronazzo, M., Vescovi, D., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S., Ludovico, L. A., & Avanzini, F. (2019). Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 139, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.010
Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multimethod approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002
Gl?veanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.006
Heyder, A., Weidinger, A. F., Cimpian, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2020). Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101220
Ho, T. K. L., & Lin, H. S. (2015). A web-based painting tool for enhancing student attitudes toward learning art creation. Computers & Education, 89, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.015
Hu, M., & Wang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in dance education: Dance for students with special educational needs. Technology in Society, 67, 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101784
Juan, Y., & Xinhui, Z. (2021). The effect of creative thinking on academic performance: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and implication. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100831
Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 97, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Puspitasari, D. (2020). Digitalisasi seni pertunjukan: Meningkatkan aksesibilitas tari tradisional Indonesia di era disrupsi. Jurnal Seni Dan Budaya Indonesia, 5(1), 12–25.
Risner, D., & Anderson, J. (2015). Digital dance: The dancemaker’s guide to social media and web 2.0. McFarland & Company.
So, K., & Hu, Y. (2019). Understanding creativity in an Asian school context: Korean teachers’ perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100573
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Wang, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in dance education: Using immersive technologies for teaching dance skills. Technology in Society, 77, 102579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102579
Zhao, Y. (2022). Teaching traditional Yao dance in the digital environment: Forms of managing subcultural forms of cultural capital in the practice of local creative industries. Technology in Society, 69, 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101943
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurcahya Nurcahya, Zakaria S Soeteja, Trianti Nugraheni, Elwi Ismail Izz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
