United Security Council Reform: A Philosophical Perspective on the Abolition of the Veto
Downloads
The reform of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has become an important topic in international relations studies, particularly regarding the veto power held by the five permanent members. This veto power creates structural injustice by reinforcing the dominance of major powers and neglecting the principles of equality and collective responsibility in maintaining global peace. A philosophical perspective reveals the tension between the moral legitimacy of global democracy and the authoritarian authority that can block vital humanitarian decisions, such as interventions to stop genocide. This study aims to analyze the impact of veto power on the UNSC's ability to address humanitarian crises and human rights violations, as well as to evaluate the application of cosmopolitan justice principles in the decisions made by the five permanent members of the UNSC. The research methodology is normative-doctrinal with a literature review, incorporating Rawls's theory of justice and the concept of cosmopolitan justice. The findings indicate that the veto obstructs swift responses to humanitarian crises and exacerbates inequality in global governance. In conclusion, UNSC reform is necessary, specifically through limiting or abolishing the veto power, to enhance justice, legitimacy, and collective effectiveness in maintaining international peace.
Agostina Latino. (2025). United Nations Security Council: Reform (im) possible? Bratislava Law Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2025.9.1.868
Ahmad, I., & Islam, M. R. (2024). Empowerment and participation: Key strategies for inclusive development. In Building strong communities: Ethical approaches to inclusive development (pp. 47–68). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Aidonojie, P. A., Ismiala, H. A., Antai, G. O., Ekpenisi, C., & Obieshi, E. (2026). Legal implications of the P5 veto power on the enforcement of ICJ judgments and its impact on the credibility of the UN Security Council. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 4(1), 42–56.
Beisheim, M., & Simon, N. (2018). Multistakeholder partnerships for the SDGs: Actors’ views on UN metagovernance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 24(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02404003
Beitz, C. R. (2017). Property and time. Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(4), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12145
Bilsky, L., & Klagsbrun, R. (2018). The return of cultural genocide? European Journal of International Law, 29(2), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy025
Clark, T. (2016). Humanitarian intervention: Moral perspectives.
Crowley, A., Baykov, A., et al. (2025). The responsibility to protect the civilians of Gaza: Building on international perceptions. Third World Quarterly, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2024.2427208
Itzkowitz Shifrinson, J. R. (2016). Deal or no deal? The end of the Cold War and the U.S. offer to limit NATO expansion. International Security, 40(4), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00236
Kato, A. (2025). Revitalizing the obligatory abstention rule in the UN Security Council: An interpretation of proviso in Article 27(3) of the UN Charter. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 30(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kraf002
Kaye, D. (2021). The spyware state and the prospects for accountability. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 27(4), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02704005
Martel, S. (2020). The polysemy of security community-building: Toward a “people-centered” Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)? International Studies Quarterly, 64(3), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa040
Mason, M. (2020). Transparency, accountability and empowerment in sustainability governance: A conceptual review. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 98–111.
Peters, A. (2023). The war in Ukraine and legal limitations on Russian vetoes. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 10(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2023.2264085
Recchia, S. (2018). Should humanitarian interveners promote democracy after genocide? International Theory, 10(1), 1–30.
Scheinin, M. (2021). Leading the world requires a new approach to terrorism, based on a moral principle. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 27(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02703004
Singh, B., & Wongmahesak, K. (2025). Multidimensional democratization governance in participatory decision-making and strengthening global democracy: Institutional reforms concerning sustainable development in the era of AI. In Democracy and democratization in the age of AI (pp. 167–186). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Sundaram, S. S. (2022). India and Asian geopolitics: The past, present. International Affairs, 98(2), 803–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac011
Tesón, F. (2021). Humanitarian intervention: An inquiry into law and morality. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Rizal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
