Digital Policing and Public Trust in Zimbabwe: a Qualitative Case Study of Post- Covid 19 Pandemic Practices in Harare Metropolitan Province
Downloads
The swift digitalization of policing in Zimbabwe has altered law enforcement operations in the post-pandemic context; however, the impact on public trust is still unclear. This study examines the impact of digital policing initiatives by the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) on public perceptions of legitimacy and accountability, addressing an existing research gap. The main aim is to analyze significant digital policing practices adopted in Harare Metropolitan Province since the onset of COVID-19, evaluate their effects on public trust, and suggest policy strategies for an inclusive and ethical digital transformation. The study employs a qualitative case study design utilizing secondary data to apply the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Social Capital Theory (SCT) in analyzing findings derived from government reports, academic literature, and media sources. The findings indicate that digital systems, including the Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS), CCTV surveillance, and online reporting forums, have improved efficiency and communication; however, they have not significantly restored trust. Citizens perceive digital policing primarily as a mechanism of citizen control rather than empowerment, attributed to insufficient data governance, inadequate responsiveness, and lack of accountability mechanisms. The research indicates that technological modernization should be synchronized with transparency, ethical standards, and citizen engagement to enhance police legitimacy and public trust. The development of robust data protection policies, enhancement of ICT capacity, and promotion of participatory digital governance are recommended to ensure that innovation fosters public trust and democratic policing.
Aborisade, R. A., & Adeleke, O. A. (2022). Pandemic Policing and Community Engagement: Preparedness, Legitimacy and Public Support During the COVID-19 Crisis in Nigeria. Criminal Justice Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168221142909
Adegbola, A., & Daramola, J. (2023). Digital transformation and policing in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. African Security Review, 32(2), 145–160.
Afrobarometer. (2023, March 31). AD625: Zimbabweans see their police as lacking in integrity, professionalism.
A.P.C.O.F. (2023). Digital Policing and Human Rights: Policy Brief for African Police Oversight Institutions. African Policing Civilian Oversight Forum.
Brayne, S. (2021). Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing. Oxford University Press.
Chigada, J., & Madzinga, R. (2022). Digital policing in Africa: Governance, ethics, and accountability challenges. Journal of African Public Administration, 9(1), 55–72.
Chingozha, M. P., Tsvere, M., & Mawere, M. (2022). Public’s perception on the conduct of the Zimbabwe Republic Police and its implications on policing in Zimbabwe. Journal of Current Engineering and Technology.
Chitongo, L. (2022). Digital communication and policing during COVID-19 in Zimbabwe: Opportunities and risks. African Journal of Governance and Development, 11(2), 45–59.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Goredema, C. (2023). Modernizing the Zimbabwe Republic Police: Opportunities and Constraints in the Digital Era. Journal of African Security Studies, 8(1), 77–95.
Herald, T. (2024, February 12). Technology revolutionising law enforcement in Zimbabwe.
Interpol. (2023). Global policing responses in the post-pandemic era: Innovation and resilience. Interpol Review, 4(2), 10–25.
Johnston, M. P. (2017). Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) Journal, 3(3), 619–626.
Makumbe, J., & Moyo, T. (2023). Policing legitimacy and citizen trust in Zimbabwe: Post-pandemic perspectives. Zimbabwe Social Science Review, 9(2), 20–34.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Mhaka, T., & Hodhera, A. (2025). Digital transformation in Zimbabwe’s public administration: Opportunities and ethical implications. GPH International Journal of Social Science & Humanities Research, 8(8), 87–103.
Munyoro, F., & Chikanya, J. (2022). Technological readiness and the future of policing in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Public Policy, 4(3), 61–78.
Mutune, M., & Mwangi, P. (2023). Digital transformation in African policing: Progress, challenges, and prospects. African Policing Review, 5(1), 55–72.
O.E.C.D. (2022). The Future of Digital Policing in a Post-COVID World. OECD Publishing.
Report, Z. R. P. A. (2023). Zimbabwe Republic Police Annual Report 2023. Police Headquarters.
Rowe, M., & Liebling, A. (2021). Reimagining policing in the digital era. Policing and Society, 31(7), 811–829.
Sandhu, A., & Fussey, P. (2022). Digital policing and the pandemic: Ethical and operational dilemmas. Policing & Society, 32(8), 1011–1030.
Tankebe, J. (2021). Trust and legitimacy in African policing. Oxford University Press.
Tyler, T. (2021). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Annual Review of Criminology, 4(1), 85–107.
U.N.O.D.C. (2023). Global Report on Innovation and Technology in Law Enforcement. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30(2), 101–118.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Copyright (c) 2026 Joshua Foma, Surya Nita, Brian Marambo, Sacrefise Cheuka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
