Analisis Pemilihan Alternatif Review Design pada Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Tol Solo-Yogyakarta-Nyia Kulonprogo Seksi 1 Paket 1.2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v4i7.6853Keywords:
review design, jalan tol, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, timbunan, efisiensi biaya Analisis Pemilihan Alternatif Review Design pada Proyek Pembangunan Jalan ToAbstract
Industri konstruksi memiliki peran krusial dalam pembangunan infrastruktur yang menjadi prioritas pemerintah. Namun, proyek konstruksi sering menghadapi tantangan yang berdampak pada produktivitas akibat ketidakpastian kondisi lapangan. Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan review design pada pekerjaan timbunan Proyek Jalan Tol Solo-Yogyakarta-NYIA Kulon Progo Seksi 1 Paket 1.2 untuk meningkatkan efisiensi biaya dan efektivitas waktu. Data diperoleh melalui Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dengan 19 stakeholder dan penyebaran kuesioner. Tiga alternatif gabungan review design dianalisis menggunakan metode Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) dengan kriteria biaya dan waktu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Review Design 1 dan 2 (RD1-RD2) memberikan efisiensi biaya terbaik dengan biaya Rp685.031.473.550,83 dan penghematan sebesar Rp145.146.955.570,84. Untuk efektivitas waktu, Review Design 3 (RD3) menunjukkan kapasitas produksi tertinggi sebesar 6.742,72 m³/hari. Pembobotan kriteria berpengaruh signifikan terhadap hasil akhir, dimana alternatif RD1-1 dan RD2-1 dengan bobot biaya 60% memberikan nilai terbaik sebesar Rp411.018.884.130,50, sedangkan RD3-1 dengan bobot waktu 40% menghasilkan kapasitas produksi 2.697,09 m³/hari. Review design terbukti dapat meningkatkan efisiensi proyek konstruksi jalan tol tanpa mengurangi kualitas.
References
Adhy, D. S. (2017). Analisis Penerapan Review Design Pada Proyek Pembuatan Kolam Lindi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Dalam Pengembangan SmartCity, 1(1).
Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., Alasadi, A., Yitmen, I., & Al-Samaraee, S. (2023). Assessing the Role and Efficiency of Thermal Insulation by the "BIO-GREEN PANEL" in Enhancing Sustainability in a Built Environment. Sustainability, 15(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310418
Cho, K., Hong, T., & Hyun, C. T. (2013). Space zoning concept-based scheduling model for repetitive construction process. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19(3), 409-421.
Dziadosz, A., & Rejment, M. (2015). Risk Analysis in Construction Project - Chosen Methods. Procedia Engineering, 122, 258-265.
Etukudoh, E. A., Nwokediegwu, Z. Q. S., Umoh, A. A., Ibekwe, K. I., Ilojianya, V. I., & Adefemi, A. (2024). Solar power integration in Urban areas: A review of design innovations and efficiency enhancements. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 1383-1394.
Institute of Management Development. (2024). World Competitiveness Ranking.
Kirby, B. J. G., & Furry, D. A. (1988). Design review process management in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 4(1), 69-82.
Manalu, L. O. M., & Harsono, M. (2023). Jejak Pemikiran Strategik pada Pembangunan Jalan Tol Trans Jawa dan Trans Sumatera. Public Policy, 4(1), 282-300.
Mujumdar, P., & Maheswari, J. U. (2018). Design iteration in construction projects - Review and directions. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(1), 321-329.
Odu, G. O. (2019). Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 23(8), 1449.
Parekh, R., & Mitchell, O. (2024). Incorporating AI into construction management: Enhancing efficiency and cost savings. International Journal of Scientific Research and Analysis, 13(1).
Rahman, H. A., Wang, C., & Yap, J. B. H. (2017). Impacts of Design Changes on Construction Project Performance: Insights from Literature Review. Journal of Quantity Surveying and Construction Business, 7(1), 31-54.
Seano, J. (2024). A Review of Recent Advances in Combining BIM and LCA for Sustainable Construction. Preprints, 2024091976.
Soibelman, L., Liu, L. Y., Kirby, J. G., East, E. W., Caldas, C. H., & Lin, K.-Y. (2003). Design Review Checking System with Corporate Lessons Learned. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(5), 475-484.
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Kurniawan, Farida Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
