Stock Valuation Of Pt Unilever Indonesia Tbk: Assessing Financial Impact Of Economic And Industry Pressures In The Fmcg Sector

Authors

  • Astrid Laregan Jota Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Erman Arif Sumirat Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Subiakto Sukarno Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v4i6.6793

Keywords:

FCMG, Financial Performance, Stock Valuations, Macroeconomic Impact, Discounted Cash Flow, Strategic Recommendations

Abstract

This study examines the financial performance and stock valuation of PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk (UNVR.JK) amid mounting economic and competitive challenges in Indonesia's fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector from 2020 to 2024. Unilever Indonesia, a market leader in household and personal care products, experienced deteriorating financial performance during this period, evidenced by declining revenue, profit margins, and market valuation. Macroeconomic pressures, including inflation, rupiah depreciation, rising operating costs, and shifting consumer preferences, have directly affected profitability and investor confidence. The company's net profit declined from IDR 5.8 trillion in 2021 to IDR 3.4 trillion in 2024, and its revenue dropped from IDR 38.6 trillion to IDR 35.1 trillion. The results indicate that although Unilever Indonesia has strong brand equity and a nationwide distribution network, the company suffers from supply chain inefficiencies, a high dependency on imported raw materials, and a limited ability to respond to rapidly evolving consumer behavior. Its market share has significantly declined, exacerbated by geopolitical boycotts and intensifying competition from nimble local companies such as Indofood CBP, Kino, and Mayora Indah. Macroeconomic variables, particularly inflation and exchange rate volatility, were found to have a statistically significant influence on financial performance and stock price volatility. Valuation analysis reveals that Unilever's intrinsic value, estimated through Discounted Cash Flow and Dividend Discount Model, exceeds its current market price. This indicates potential undervaluation if the company achieves operational improvements and strategic realignment. Based on these findings, the strategic recommendations proposed are diversifying the supply chain to reduce exposure to imported inputs, accelerating digital transformation across marketing and distribution, expanding into high-growth categories aligned with health and wellness trends, strengthening risk management frameworks to hedge macroeconomic shocks, and restructuring cost base to improve long-term profitability .

References

Aquilante, T., Di Pace, F., & Masolo, R. M. (2022). Exchange-rate and news: Evidence from the COVID pandemic. Economics Letters, 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110390

Calderwood, LaureCalderwood, Lauren Uppink, & Soshkin, Maksim. (2019). T. travel and tourism competitiveness report 2019. W. E. Forum. n U., & Soshkin, M. (2019). The travel and tourism competitiveness report 2019.

Dilanchiev, A., & Taktakishvili, T. (2021). Currency depreciation nexus country’s export: Evidence from Georgia. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090521

Hofmann, B., Shim, I., & Shin, H. S. (2021). Emerging Market Economy Exchange Rates and Local Currency Bond Markets Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761875

Hoshikawa, T., & Yoshimi, T. (2021). The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on South Korea’s Stock Market and Exchange Rate. Developing Economies, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12276

Iyoboyi, M., & Muftau, O. (2014). Impact of exchange rate depreciation on the balance of payments: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Cogent Economics and Finance, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.923323

Kuzmina, K., Prendeville, S., Walker, D., & Charnley, F. (2019). Future scenarios for fast-moving consumer goods in a circular economy. Futures, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.12.001

Malhotra, G., Dandotiya, G., Shaiwalini, S., Khan, A., & Homechaudhuri, S. (2024). Benchmarking for organisational competitiveness: a resource-based view perspective. Benchmarking. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2023-0668

Neboh, N. D., & Mbhele, T. P. (2022). SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE OF THE FAST-MOVING CONSUMER GOODS INDUSTRY. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i3art7

Niedermeier, A., Emberger-Klein, A., & Menrad, K. (2021). Which factors distinguish the different consumer segments of green fast-moving consumer goods in Germany? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2718

Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.

Saptana, Sukmaya, S. G., Perwita, A. D., Malihah, F. D., Wardhana, I. W., Pitaloka, A. D., Ghaisani, S. A., Sayaka, B., Ilham, N., & Karmawati, E. (2023). Competitiveness analysis of fresh tomatoes in Indonesia: Turning comparative advantage into competitive advantage. Plos One, 18(11), e0294980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294980

Shrivastava, P. (2018). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. In Business Ethics and Strategy, Volumes I and II (pp. 317–334). Routledge.

Sundström, M., & Hjelm-Lidholm, S. (2020). Re-positioning customer loyalty in a fast moving consumer goods market. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.09.004

Tassell, C., & Aurisicchio, M. (2023). Refill at home for fast-moving consumer goods: Uncovering compliant and divergent consumer behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.018

West, D. C., Ford, J. B., & Ibrahim, E. (2015). Strategic marketing: creating competitive advantage. Oxford University Press, USA.

World Bank. (2020). Indonesia: Skills for Jobs and Competitiveness Report.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-28