The Phenomenon of Disparity in a Criminal Case
Main Article Content
The phenomenon of disparities in criminal cases is increasingly common, this is caused by several underlying factors. In deciding a case, a judge must be objective in deciding the case he is proceeding over so that the public's trust in the law remains pure without intervention by any party. This research aims to determine the factors that underlie disparities in criminal cases as well as efforts to overcome the disparity phenomenon. This research uses normative legal research methods and to analyze using qualitative descriptive analysis. The research results show several factors including: 1) Background, 2) Facts of the Trial, 3) Requisition or Prosecutor's Demands and 4) Mens Rea or a person's inner intention in committing a crime. Meanwhile, efforts to overcome this phenomenon include guidance provided by the Supreme Court to judges. Judges must also adhere firmly to the law on judicial power and pay attention to Article 54 of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (KUHP). and supervision is carried out so that the judge in leading a trial process does not have interference from any party who is not responsible.
Abdurrachman, Hamidah, Nugraha, Rahmad Agung, & Majestya, Nayla. (2020). Judges' Palu Versus Sense of Justice An Introduction to the Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Corruption Crimes . Deepublish.
Al Yuhri, Ahmad. (2023). Analysis of Criminal Claims (Requisitoir) for the Death Penalty in Cases of Sexual Violence Against Children (Analysis of Criminal Claims in Case Number: 989/id. Sus/2021/PN. Bdg) . Sultan Agung Islamic University (Indonesia).
Arifin, Andi. (2023). The Role of Judges in Realizing the Indonesian Rule of Law. IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research , 1 (1), 6–10.
Barhamudin, Barhamudin, & Bustomi, Abuyazid. (2019). Judge's Independence from a Statesman's Perspective. Solutions , 17 , 269–284.
Bhakti, Rizky Atswari, Putrajaya, Nyoman Union, & Pujiyono, Pujiyono. (2017). Criminal Disparity in Judges' Decisions at the Semarang District Court Regarding the Crime of Murder. Diponegoro Law Journal , 6 (4), 1–18.
Doctoral, Dissertation, & Mahrus, Moh (Nd). Wakf Dispute Resolution And Asset Protection.
Hadmoko, Anang Eka, Muchamad Iksan, SH, & Bambang Sukoco, SH (2014). Criminal Disparity in Decisions on Theft Crime Cases in the Klaten District Court (Case Study of Decision No. 97/Pid. B/2013/Pn. Klt and Decision No. 53/Pid. B/2013/PN. Klt) . Muhammadiyah Surakarta university.
Hasan, Zainudin, & Firmansyah, Devi. (2020). Disparity in Criminal Application to Narcotics Abuse Perpetrators. Legal Institutions , 15 (2), 221–237.
Hasibuan, Edi Saputra, & SH, MH (2021). Police law and criminal policy in law enforcement . PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Press.
Hatirindah, Christine Isti. (2020). Disparity Of Penalties In Narcotics Users According To The Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 35 Of 2009 Concerning Narcotics. To-Ra , 6 (3), 226–237.
Manurung, Frengky, Syahrin, Alvi, Ablisar, Madiasa, & Sunarmi, Sunarmi. (2021). Disparity in Judges' Decisions Regarding Narcotics Crimes in the Legal Area of the Rantauprapat District Court (Case Study of Decision No. 159/PID. SUS/2019/PN. RAP and Decision NO. 626/PID. SUS/2020/PN. RAP). Law Journal , 2 (1), 62–80.
Marentek, Junio Imanuel. (2019). Criminal Responsibility of Perpetrators of the Crime of Premeditated Murder is Viewed from Article 340 of the Criminal Code. Lex Crimen , 8 (11).
Pranata, Robert, Indarti, Erlyn, & Indraswari, Tri Laksmi. (2017). The Discovery of Law and Paradigms: A Legal Philosophy Study of the Criminal Justice Process in the Semarang City District Court. Diponegoro Law Journal , 5 (4), 1–20.
Putra, AA Ngr Rai Anjasmara, Sepud, I. Made, & Sujana, I. Nyoman. (2020). Disparity in Judge Decisions in Narcotics Crimes. Journal of Legal Analogy , 2 (2), 129–135.
Rais, Muslihin. (2017). The Value of Justice in Judges' Decisions in Corruption Crime Cases. Al Daulah: Journal of Criminal and Constitutional Law , 6 (1), 121–144.
Sugiono, Agus, Setyorini, Erny Herlin, & Yudianto, Otto. (2021). The return of the assets of those convicted of corruption after a court decision has permanent legal force. Yustitia Journal , 22 (1).
Zilvia, Rahmi, & Haryadi, Haryadi. (2020). Criminal Disparities Against Perpetrators of Persecution Crime Cases. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law , 1 (1), 96–109.
