JESSICA WONGSO AND THE SEARCH FOR HIDDEN CAUSALITY IN THE POISONED COFFEE CASE
The 2016 murder case of Wayan Mirna Salihin in a Jakarta cafe sent shockwaves across Indonesia. Mirna tragically passed away after consuming coffee suspected of being laced with cyanide. Jessica Wongso, her friend, received a life sentence for the crime. The case garnered widespread attention due to the cyanide's involvement, the intricate relationship between Jessica and Mirna, and the contentious trial proceedings. Public outcry and debates over the evidence's reliability sparked inquiries into potential hidden motives. This study delves into uncovering these concealed factors, employing qualitative methodologies and analyzing psychological, social, cultural, and environmental aspects. By doing so, it aims to shed light on Jessica's motivations and the context surrounding her actions, thereby contributing to public comprehension and legal discourse. Despite Jessica's conviction, doubts persist, particularly regarding her motives and the chain of causality. Police investigations relied on coffee orders and Jessica's cyanide purchase, yet inconsistencies in DNA testing and unclear motives fueled skepticism. Exploring causality helps discern cause-and-effect relationships, identify underlying issues, assess evidence, prompt further investigations, and unveil concealed truths. Beyond Jessica's culpability, questions linger regarding cyanide's broader implications, potential third-party involvement, Jessica's psychological profile, and the clarity of causality. This case underscores the intricacies of real-life causality, emphasizing the importance of a nuanced understanding in ensuring justice prevails.
Abdillah, M. S. (2020). Penerapan Asas Kausalitas Dalam Lecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Menyebabkan Korban Meninggal Dunia. Kertha Semaya, 8(5), 800–808.
Ahmad Sofian, S. H. (2020). Ajaran Kausalitas Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media.
Ariyanti, V. (2020). Equity Sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Pidana Perempuan. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v5.i1.p63-84
Farmer, L. (2016). Making the modern criminal law: Criminalization and civil order. Oxford University Press.
Farmer, L. (2020). Crime and punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 14, 289–298.
Febrian-Eny, D. A. W.-H., Maulana-Nelson, R.-S. T.-A., & Simamora, N. (n.d.). Eksaminasi Perkara Mary Jane.
Fitrah, M., & Luthfiyah. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Penelitian Kualitatif, Tindakan Kelas & Studi Kasus (D. Ruslan & Dr. Moch. Mahfud Effendi (eds.); Cetakan Pe). CV. Jejak.
Fitriah, N. (2021). Kejahatan Kekerasan Psikis dan Penelantaran Perempuan sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia. DE JURE Critical Laws Journal, 2(1), 23–35.
Hadi, I. P., Wahjudianata, M., & Indrayani, I. I. (2020). Komunikasi massa. In Komunikasi Massa. CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.
Hermalis, T. (n.d.). Pengaruh pemberitaan kopi sianida di TV One terhadap persepsi penerapan hukum di Indonesia: Survei Terhadap Warga Perumahan Pamulang Asri. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta: Fakultas Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2017.
Hermawan, F., & Purnomo, H. (2023). Analisis Teori Dusta Umberto Eco Dalam Kasus Kopi Sianida Jessica Wongso. Brand Communication: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(4), 390–412.
Khotimah, H., Dewi, K., Lubis, L. K. L. U., Prayogo, M. D. A., Virdi, S., & Khoiriah, S. U. (2023). Analisis Akar Penyebab Pembunuhan dalam Masyarakat Indonesia: Perspektif Teori Anomie Durkheim. JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v2i3.983
Khudzaifah Dimyati, S. H., Sri Waljinah, S., Kelik Wardiono, S. H., Iksan, M., & SH, M. (n.d.). Paradigma Baru Dalam Penelitian Hukum: Pengalaman Pendekatan Objek Normatif dalam Penyidikan Perkara Pidana. Muhammadiyah University Press.
Mavilinda, H. F., Nazaruddin, A., Nofiawaty, N., Siregar, L. D., Andriana, I., & Thamrin, K. M. H. (2021). Menjadi “UMKM Unggul” Melalui Optimalisasi Strategi Pemasaran Digital dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Bisnis di Era New Normal. Sricommerce: Journal of Sriwijaya Community Services, 2(1), 17–28.
Muksin, M. R. S., & Rochaeti, N. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Keterangan Ahli Kedokteran Forensik Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.343-358
Pascoe, D., & Smith, T. (2022). Suspended Execution Beyond China’s Borders. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(1), 2012–2020.
Pruenela, M., & Kalijaga, I. K. U. I. N. S. (n.d.). Analisis Opini Publik Mengenai Dampak Atau Efek Sampung Vaksinanasi Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Wajah Opini Publik Di Media Massa, 234.
Reiner, R. (2016). Crime, the mystery of the common-sense concept. John Wiley & Sons.
Rizal, S., Nasir, M., & Pratiwi, I. (2023). Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Islam Perspektif al-Ghazali. Lentera: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 5(2), 122–150. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v5i2.7344
Rosel, T., & Suyanto, S. (2017). Analisi Framing Pemberitaan Sidang Kasus Kopi Sianida Jessica Kumala Wongso di Media Online Www. kompas. com. Riau University.
Rozarie, R. A. De. (2019). Bunga Rampai Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia di indonesia.
Sari, A. V. (2022). Analisis Koherensi Dalam Topik Fiksi Mini (Coherence Analysis in The Topic of Mini-Fiction). Kandai, 18(1), 22–43.
Siregar, R. E. A. A. (2016). Due Process of Law dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Kaitannya dengan Perlindungan HAM. FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 1(1), 35–46. 10.24952/fitrah.v1i1.326
Starks, M. R. (2020). Struktur logis kesadaran.
Tripa, S. (2019). Diskursus Metode dalam Penelitian Hukum. Bandar Publishing.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
