Rounded Corner sebagai Strategi Soft Geometry dalam Desain Interior: Kajian Literatur Berbasis Psikologi Lingkungan terhadap Estetika, Kenyamanan Visual, dan Persepsi Keamanan Ruang

Main Article Content

M Zaynul Ngabidin
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Firman Hawari
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Susy Budi Astuti
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Thomas Ari Kristianto
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Perkembangan desain interior kontemporer menunjukkan pergeseran dari pendekatan yang berorientasi fungsi menuju desain yang berpusat pada pengalaman dan kesejahteraan pengguna. Bentuk geometris ruang, termasuk sudut melengkung, memengaruhi persepsi estetika, kenyamanan visual, dan persepsi keamanan. Manusia modern menghabiskan sekitar 80–90% aktivitas hariannya di dalam ruang, sehingga kualitas desain interior berdampak signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji penerapan sudut membulat sebagai strategi geometri lunak dalam desain interior dari perspektif Psikologi Lingkungan, dengan fokus pada estetika, kenyamanan visual, dan persepsi keamanan ruang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review dengan menelaah artikel ilmiah yang relevan mengenai sudut membulat, bentuk kurvilinear, geometri lembut, estetika visual, kenyamanan visual, persepsi keamanan, dan Psikologi Lingkungan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk melengkung cenderung menghasilkan respons estetika yang lebih positif, meningkatkan kenyamanan visual melalui kemudahan pencahayaan visual, serta mengurangi dampak ancaman yang sering diasosiasikan dengan sudut tajam. Dengan demikian, sudut membulat tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai elemen dekoratif, tetapi juga sebagai strategi desain yang mendukung terciptanya interior ruang yang lebih humanis, nyaman, aman, dan berorientasi pada kesejahteraan pengguna.


Keywords: Sudut membulat, soft geometri, desain interior, psikologi lingkungan
Alharbi, S., & Basaad, H. (2022). The Impact of Indoor, Outdoor and Urban Architecture on Human Psychology. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(3A), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2022.101317
Bae, S., & Asojo, A. (2020). Nurses’ Perception of Safety on Hospital Interior Environments and Infectious Diseases: An Exploratory Study. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 3(3), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-19-33
Corradi, G., & Munar, E. (2020). The Curvature Effect. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/672nk
Gharipour, M., Tyne, I. A., Afsary, S., Hemme, N., & Trout, A. (2022). A Community Healthcare Clinic in Baltimore: Healing Environment, Design Criteria, and Assessment Metrics. Archnet-Ijar International Journal of Architectural Research, 17(4), 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/arch-02-2022-0051
Hassan, M. M., Tedong, P. A., Khir, A. M., Shari, Z., Ponrahono, Z., & Sharifudin, M. P. (2023). Exploring the Effects of the Built Environment on Urban Community Wellbeing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i10/18699
Hu, M., & Roberts, J. D. (2020). Connections and Divergence Between Public Health and Built Environment—A Scoping Review. Urban Science, 4(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4010012
Kallegias, A., & Pattichi, E. (2016). Elemental Intricacy - Architectural Complexity Through Hard and Soft Material Agency. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2016.1.475
Lee, E. J., & Park, S.-J. (2022). Biophilic Experience-Based Residential Hybrid Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8512. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148512
Miao, Y., Liu, P., Fu, I. C. S., Lei, Q., Lau, S. S. Y., & Tao, Y. (2022). The Study of Architectural Geometry and Shape in the Energy Balance of Glazed Roofs. Buildings, 12(10), 1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101550
Palumbo, L., Rampone, G., Bertamini, M., Sinico, M., Clarke, E., & Vartanian, O. (2022). Visual Preference for Abstract Curvature and for Interior Spaces: Beyond Undergraduate Student Samples. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 16(4), 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000359
Shetty, R. S., Kamath, G. B., Rodrigues, L. L. R., Nandineni, R. D., & Shetty, S. R. (2024). The Impact of the Physical Environment on Staff in Healthcare Facilities: A Systematic Literature Review. Buildings, 14(9), 2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092773
Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Rostrup, N., Skov, M., Corradi, G., & Nadal, M. (2019). Preference for Curvilinear Contour in Interior Architectural Spaces: Evidence From Experts and Nonexperts. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 13(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000150
Wang, L., & Keat, O. B. (2024). Cultural Analysis of Chinese Architectural Interior Design. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i04-55
Yan, S., Azmi, A., Mansor, N., Wang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Healing Spaces as a Design Approach to Optimize Emotional Regulation for Patients With Mood Disorders. Buildings, 14(2), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14020472
Yang, J., & Lü, H. (2022). Visualizing the Knowledge Domain in Urban Soundscape: A Scientometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113912
Ye, Y., Huang, Y., & Li, S. (2023). A Multidisciplinary Perspective on the Relationship Between Sustainable Built Environment and User Perception: A Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1271889
?????????, ?. (2023). ?????????????? ???????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ??? ????????????? ??????????. ????????????? ????????????, 1, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.36627/2619-1407-2023-1-1-10-20