Implications Of Lion Group's Non-Compliance In Reporting Changes In Airfare Policies To Monopolistic Practices And Unfair Business Competition In The Aviation Industry
Main Article Content
The aviation industry in Indonesia plays an important role in supporting community mobility and the national economy. However, non-compliance with regulations, especially in reporting changes in ticket fare policies, has the potential to create monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. One of the cases that emerged was Lion Group's non-compliance which had an impact on the structure of the domestic aviation market. This study aims to analyze the implications of Lion Group's non-compliance with fare regulations on business competition in the aviation industry. The approach used is juridical-normative with data collection techniques through literature studies. The data analyzed includes laws and regulations, legal decisions, and related literature.
The results of the study show that Lion Group's non-compliance creates barriers for competitors, reduces consumer choice, and increases the risk of unhealthy market dominance. This violates the principles of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unhealthy Business Competition.
The implications of this study show the urgency of strengthening regulation and supervision by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) to prevent similar violations. Transparency in tariff policies and commitment to regulation are needed to create healthy and fair competition in the aviation industry.
This non-compliance has much greater implications than just an internal problem of the company. This also has an impact on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition that can harm consumers and other business actors. In this context, business competition law, especially Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition, is important to maintain healthy competition. Non-compliance with the reporting of these tariff changes not only has the potential to lead to competitive unfairness, but can also exacerbate market dominance by a single company, thereby suppressing the diversity of choices for consumers.
Through this study, the legal and economic implications of Lion Group's non-compliance with tariff reporting provisions in the business competition law will be analyzed. The author will also examine the extent of its impact on business competition in the Indonesian aviation industry, as well as the steps that can be taken by the relevant authorities to prevent monopolistic practices and promote fair competition. This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the importance of compliance with fare regulations in creating a healthy and sustainable business climate in the aviation industry.
Antoni, V. (2019). "The Shadow of Cartels in Competition Law." Journal of Economic Law, Vol. 7 No. 2.
Asri Sitompul, Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition (Review of Law Number 5 of 1999), (1999). Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Boediono, Microeconomics, Malang; BPFE Yogyakarta, 2013.
Gregory N. Mankiw,(2003). Introduction to Economics, Jakarta: Erlangga.
Hermansyah, Principles of Competition Law in Indonesia, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
I earned a Bachelor's degree in Principles of Evidence of Competition Procedural Law, (2014). Sidoarjo; Zifatama.
Law on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, Law Number 5 of 1999. LN 1999 No. 33 TLN No. 3817.
Lubis, AF, et al. (2020). "Enforcement of Competition Law in the Application of Indirect Evidence in Cartel Cases." Jurnal Privat Law, Vol. VIII No. 2 July-December 2020.
Mantili, R., Kusmayanti, H., & Afriana, A. (2016). "Problematics of Enforcing Competition Law in Indonesia in the Framework of Creating Legal Certainty." De Jure Journal of Legal Research, Vol. 16 No. 1.
Nadapdap, B. (2019). "Application of Efficiency Theory in Rule of Reason Approach in Business Competition Cases." Private Law Journal.
Regulation of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission concerning Guidelines for Administrative Actions in accordance with the provisions of Article 47 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, Perkom Number 4 of 2009.
Saputro, PA (2012). "Legal Problems of Regulating Obligations for Notification of Company Share Acquisitions." Private Law Journal.
Siregar, M. (2018). "Legal Position of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in Exercising the Authority to Enforce Business Competition Law." Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 30 No. 2.
Soemardi, TP (2008). "Analysis of Merger, Acquisition, and Consolidation Regulations of Companies in the Perspective of Business Competition Law." Jurnal Privat Law, Vol. 9 No. 2 July-December 2021.
Soepadmo, NR (2020). "Business Competition Law." Journal of Law & Development, Vol. 50 No. 3.
Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, (2003 ).Normative Legal Research; Short Destinations, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Sudiarto, H. (2021). "Introduction to Competition Law in Indonesia." Journal of Business Law, Vol. 5 No. 1.
Suhasril and Mohamad Taufik Makarao, (2010). Law on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia, Bogor; Ghallia,
Sumarni, AT, et al. (2020). "Implementation of Justice Collaborator in Repositioning Indonesian Law Enforcement." Journal of Private Law.
