Solving Child Crimes Through Restorative Justice and Diversion from Legal Sociological Aspects
Main Article Content
Since the 19th century, children have been objects of scientific study, yet legal responses to children in conflict with the law often prioritize punishment over protection. This research aims to analyze the application of restorative justice and diversion in resolving child crimes from the perspective of legal sociology. The study employed normative legal research using primary legal materials (laws and regulations) and secondary legal materials (legal literature, journal articles, and research reports), analyzed descriptively-analytically. The findings reveal that although Indonesian Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Child Criminal Justice System mandates diversion for children aged 12-18 years, its implementation faces obstacles due to a lack of understanding among law enforcement officials, societal pressure for retribution, and exceptions for serious crimes (punishable by over 7 years). Restorative justice, as developed by UNICEF, offers a recovery-oriented approach involving victims, perpetrators, and the community. The sociological perspective demonstrates that law is not merely a normative system but is embedded in social values, norms, and power relations. The practical implication is the need for capacity building for police, prosecutors, and judges, as well as community-based mediation programs to prioritize the best interests of the child.
Amanah, D. A., Nurbayani, S., et al. (2023). Dinamika peran perempuan Sunda dalam kepemimpinan politik era modern. Jurnal Analisis Sosiologi, 12(2), 410–430.
Amrani, H., & Ali, M. (2015). Sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana perkembangan dan penerapan. Yogyakarta.
Anderson, I. (2022). Thug life as framework for stages of consciousness: Examining how Black male MOB youth navigate processes of alienation. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 4(2), 37–55.
Arliman, L. S. (2024). Hukum dan masyarakat: Peran sosiologi hukum dalam memahami interaksi sistem hukum dengan realitas sosial. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 6(3), 12.
Banwell-Moore, R. (2024). Restorative justice: Adopting a whole system approach to address cultural barriers in criminal justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 24(5), 1028–1046.
Bao, J., Zhang, S., Zhou, W., & Zhang, S. (2018). Evaluation of burst pressure of corroded pipe segments using three-dimensional finite element analyses. International Pipeline Conference, 51869, V001T03A043.
Bell, W. (2017). Foundations of futures studies: Volume 2: Values, objectivity, and the good society. Routledge.
Doherty, F. (2015). Obey all laws and be good: Probation and the meaning of recidivism. Georgetown Law Journal, 104, 291–354.
Fatoni, S. (2015). Pembaharuan sistem pemidanaan. Mojokerto.
Hamzah, A. (2017). Hukum pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno. (2015). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Nisbet, R. (2023). The quest for community: A study in the ethics of order and freedom. Simon and Schuster.
Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (2019). The role of deterrence in the formulation of criminal law rules: At its worst when doing its best. In Deterrence (pp. 3–56). Routledge.
Saleh, W. K., & Agusta, M. (2020). Hukum dan masyarakat dalam perspektif sosiologi hukum. Datin Law Jurnal, 1(2).
Sliva, S., Shaw, M., & Han, T. M. (2020). Policy to practice: An implementation case study in restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(4), 527–543.
Soekanto, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Stewart, R., & Ezell, J. M. (2024). Understanding perceptions, barriers, and opportunities around restorative justice in urban high schools. Urban Education, 59(9), 2619–2648.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
Wulandari, D., Nur, S., et al. (n.d.). Perspektif dan peran sosiologi ekonomi dalam pembangunan ekonomi masyarakat berdasarkan Al-Qur’an. At Tarbiyah, 130–139.
