Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII)
Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025
p-ISSN: 2828-1284 e-ISSN: 2810-062x
Website: https: //rivierapublishing.id/JII/ index.php / jii /index
Doi: 10.58344/jii.v4i1.6189 1003
ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGY PROBLEMS IN GRADE X SCIENCE
TEXTBOOKS BASED ON BLOOM'S TAXONOMY ON ANDERSON'S
REVISION AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia
yayuapriangimela@gmail.com
Keywords
Abstract
Analysis Questions,
LOTS, HOTS
Study This analyze problem biology in class X science book based on
Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy and skills communication
students. Challenges learning the 21st century demands development
think critical and communication, but majority question in book text Still
focuses on Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS). Research aiming
evaluate conformity question with dimensions cognitive Bloom's
Taxonomy and identifying support to skills communication. Research
This use approach quantitative descriptive with analyze question in book
text based on LOTS and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
categories, as well as supporting elements communication scientific.
Research result show that 66.32% of the questions in virus chapter and
72.29% of questions in chapter diversity creature life is at in LOTS
category, with domination level cognitive remembering (C1) and
understanding (C2). The proportion of HOTS, such as analysis (C4) and
creation (C6), very low, indicating limitations in facilitate think critical.
Support to skills communication is also minimal, limited to discussion
simple without strengthening presentation or debate.
Study This highlight the need improvement amount question HOTS
based and enrichment element communication in book text For support
learning holistic. Findings This give implications important for
development more teaching materials balanced and relevant with
demands Independent Curriculum. Books text expected can push student
For think critical, creative, and communicative, supporting scientific
literacy in the era of modern learning.
Corresponding Author : Mela Yayu Apriangi
E-mail: Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
INTRODUCTION
In the era of globalization, education has become element key in determine quality source
Power man a nation. Global issues regarding education highlight the need system adaptive
learning to changes, including in aspects curriculum and methods evaluation. One of the the
approach that gets attention wide is implementation Bloom's Taxonomy, in particular revisions
made by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001). Revisions This emphasize importance achievement
competence cognitive through analysis, evaluation, and creation, which are relevant with
demands 21st century (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001).
In the Indonesian context, the issue specific that often appear is How Biology textbooks,
especially at the high school level, are able to reflect demands competence cognitive said.
Analysis questions biology in book text often show mismatch with level expected cognitive.
For example, Apriangi (2024) found that Lots question in science books for class X only focus
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1004
on the level of understanding basic, so that No push student For develop skills think critical
and communication. This is show the need update in compilation questions and evaluation
learning.
Urgency study This is also supported by the findings (Tony, 2021), which shows that
book school electronics (BSE) high school biology often No fulfil criteria level cognitive
Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy. While that, Hasanah (2017) highlighted that
implementation evaluation learning biology at Blitar City High School Still use approach less
traditional effective in increase competence students. Both studies This underline the need
more analysis deep For ensure that textbooks meet standard expected education.
Review literature show that implementation Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy in
textbooks have potential For increase quality learning. Juhanda, (2016) take notes that analysis
question based on level cognitive help teachers understand level difficulty appropriate question
with ability students. More Furthermore, Mulyasa (2021) emphasized importance
implementation The 2013 curriculum demands integration between competence cognitive and
skills communication. Therefore that, analysis This No only important For evaluate quality
textbooks, but also for increase effectiveness learning in a way overall.
Updates offered in study This is a more approach comprehensive in analyze question
biology based on Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy.Nugraha & Jamilah, (2024) mention
that revision This give clear guidance for educator in to design question that is not only test
knowledge factual, but also ability analytical and synthetic. With Thus, research This
contribute in provide a more comprehensive evaluation model relevant with need modern
education.
Based on existing references, Rahmawati and Nugroho (2021 ) highlighted importance
evaluation skills communication student through question biology based on Bloom's revised
taxonomy . This is relevant with findings Sapitri, Kurniati, and Yuliawati (2022), who showed
that that quality biology final exam questions often not reflect need student For think critical.
Sari and Ulfa (2022) also noted that Lots high school biology textbook failed measure skills
think critical student in a way adequate.
Under development evaluation education, Sudjana (2019) and Purwanto (2020)
emphasize importance principles and techniques development - oriented evaluation
competence students. Analysis This become base in compile instrument evaluation that is not
only measure results learning, but also supports a more comprehensive learning process.
holistic . Ulfa and Sari (2022) showed that analysis textbooks that focus on scientific literacy
can help increase quality learning biology at high school level.
Overall analysis This aiming For give a comprehensive overview about quality biology
textbook class X. With use Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy as framework work,
research This expected can give solution on existing problems and support development
education more biology good in the future.
RESEARCH METHODS
This study uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive method, which aims to describe
a phenomenon or situation systematically, factually, and accurately. In this study, the
researcher analyzed LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) and Higher Order Thinking Skills
(HOTS) questions in grade X science books on Biology material based on Bloom's revised
Bloom Taxonomy in categories C1 to C6, and analyzed the distribution of communication
skills development in manuscripts contained in grade X science books. This analysis was
carried out using the Bloom Taxonomy framework, where each question and manuscript in the
book was analyzed to identify and describe the form of LOTS and HOTS questions, and to
determine the development of students' communication skills objectively and systematically.
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1005
Thus, this study provides a clear and detailed picture of the form and cognitive level of LOTS
and HOTS questions in textbooks, as well as how far is the book This support development
ability communication students (Adilah Sabir, 2021).
Time and Place of Research, namely in the even semester at SMA N 1 Taraju in the
2023/2024 academic year, residents used all biology questions and texts in the grade X science
book which were the objects of analysis to see the distribution of questions and scripts in the
LOTS and HOTS categories and Communication Skills and The object of research is the
distribution of questions and scripts in the LOTS and HOTS categories and Communication
Skills.
Then the selected sample was one science book for grade X from the most commonly
used publisher in SMA Negeri 1 Taraju, Tasikamalaya Regency entitled "The World of Natural
Sciences" written by Dra. Maryati, M.Pd, Dr. Endang Susilowati, S.Si., M.Si, and Arinto
Nugroho, S.Si. and in this book is also in accordance with the Merdeka Curriculum. Sample
selection was carried out by purposive sampling, with the criteria of books that are widely used
and recognized by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology. And using
Bloom's Taxonomy revised by Anderson and Krathwohl classifies cognitive processes into six
levels: remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. This
revision adds dimensions of knowledge, namely: factual, conceptual, procedural, and
metacognitive (Anderson & Krathwol, 2001). Meanwhile, supporting data includes
manuscripts or texts in books related to communication skills. In addition, the results of the
analysis of the distribution of questions and manuscripts, for evaluate fulfillment criteria
Bloom's Taxonomy and support skills communication .
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From the results of the research on the two materials, there are diagrams including:
1. Presentation of Analysis Results of Questions on the Chapter on Viruses and Their Role
at the Cognitive Level
Figure 1. Presentation of Results of Analysis of Questions on the Chapter on Viruses
and Their Role at the Cognitive Level
Analysis results show that majority question in chapter This is at the LOTS level, with
domination level cognitive C1 (remembering) as many as 36 questions and C2 ( understanding)
as many as 22 questions. The proportion questions at the level cognitive C3 to C6 is very small,
indicating that book text more focus on mastery information base than development skills think
critical and creative. This is reflect that although material about the virus has potential For push
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5 C6
Analysis of the Chapter Questions on Viruses and
Their Role
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1006
analysis deep, book text Not yet take advantage of it optimally for support learning HOTS-
based (Sabir, 2021; Anderson, 2001).
2. Presentation of Analysis Results of Diversity Chapter Living Things with Cognitive Levels
Figure 2. Presentation of the Results of the Analysis of the Chapter on the Diversity of
Living Things with Cognitive Levels
In chapter diversity creature life, pattern similar seen, with 31 questions at C1 and 22
questions at C2. Questions at levels C3 to C6 are very few, with only 7 questions at C3 level.
Analysis This show that chapter This Not yet push student For think critical or evaluate
concepts diversity life. In fact, the concept This own potential big For associated with global
issues such as conservation environment and sustainability (Zohar, 2023; Utami, 2023).
3. Presentation of Results of Analysis of HOTS and LOTS Questions in the Chapter on
Viruses and Their Role
Figure 3. Presentation of the Results of the Analysis of HOTS and LOTS Questions in
the Chapter on Viruses and Their Role
Analysis show that Of the total 63 questions, 66.32 % were answered in LOTS category.
Most of be at the level cognitive C1 and C2. Only some small questions that support HOTS,
such as analysis (C4) or evaluation (C5). This is reflect the need improvement amount
prompting questions student For do evaluation critical to the impact of the virus or submit
solution innovative related the role of viruses in ecosystem (Anderson, 2001; Yola, 2022).
37.35%
26.51%
8.43%
12.05%
13.25%, 2.41%
Chapter Questions on Diversity of Living
Things
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
33.68%
66.32%
HOTS and LOTS Question Analysis on Viruses
and Their Role
Hots Lots
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1007
4. Presentation of HOTS Questions Chapter Analysis Results about Diversity Living things
Figure 4. Presentation of the Results of the Analysis of HOTS Question Chapters on the
Diversity of Living Things
Of the 60 questions analyzed, 72.29 % were in LOTS category, with domination level
cognitive C1 and C2. Proportion questions at the HOTS level are very low, with only 7
questions on C3 and some small at C4 to C6. This is show that although chapter This potential
big For push analysis deep, like discussion about endangered species extinct, book text Not yet
give Enough support For development of students' HOTS (Setiawan, 2023).
5. Comparative Presentation of HOTS, LOTS, and Communication Skills Analysis Results
Figure 5. Comparative Presentation of HOTS, LOTS, and Communication Skills
Analysis Results
These results indicate that the questions in this book are more likely to test basic skills than
critical thinking and problem- solving skills. communication, which is still can improved For
support development more students holistic. The comparison results show that textbooks focus
more on LOTS than HOTS, with minimal contribution to communication skills. Most of the
questions only involve simple discussions, without facilitating more complex scientific
communication, such as presentations or debates. To support holistic learning, it is necessary
to add problem-based questions that encourage analysis, evaluation, and development of
creative solutions. Activities like this can improve students' communication skills and their
scientific literacy (Yola, 2022; Suparman, 2023).
27.71%
72.29%
HOTS Question Analysis for the Diversity of
Living Things Chapter
Hots Lots
16.63%
37.25%
46.12%
Comparison of HOTS, LOTS, and Skills
Question Analysis Results
HOTS LOTS Ket. Komunikasi
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1008
The analysis of the distribution of LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) and HOTS
(Higher Order Thinking Skills) questions in grade X Biology textbooks based on Bloom's
Revised Anderson Taxonomy aims to evaluate the extent to which the textbooks support the
development of students' thinking skills. LOTS covers basic skills, such as remembering,
understanding, and applying (C1-C3), while HOTS involves analyzing, evaluating, and
creating (C4-C6), which are important for practicing critical and creative thinking (Anderson
& Krathwohl, 2001). In addition, the evaluation also considers the development of
communication skills, which can be seen through discussion questions, written reports, and
oral presentations (Arifin, 2023).
In biology materials such as viruses and biodiversity, there is potential to build
problem-based questions that not only trigger in-depth analysis but also train students' scientific
communication skills. For example, questions that ask students to analyze the impact of virus
reproduction in an ecosystem or present solutions for biodiversity conservation can improve
evaluative and argumentative thinking skills (Zohar, 2023; Utami, 2023). This analysis
provides insight into whether this book is suitable for the needs of modern education that
emphasizes learning and collaboration based on skills high (Arifin, 2023).
CONCLUSION
Analysis to book Biology class X shows that majority question in book text This Still
dominated by the Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) category, especially at the level
cognitive C1 (remembering) and C2 (understanding) according to Anderson's revised Bloom's
Taxonomy. Only part of it small questions that meet Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)
categories such as analysis (C4), evaluation (C5), and creation (C6). Findings This indicates
that book text the Not yet fully support development skills think critical and creative students.
In addition, although there is elements Supporter For skills communication, its contribution
Still limited to discussion simple and yet give enough space For more activities complex like
presentation or debate. This is show the need improvement in design questions and activities
learning to be more capable support scientific literacy and ability think level relevant height
with challenge 21st century.
REFERENCE
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and
Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York:
Longman.
Apriangi, MY (2024). Analysis question biology in science books for class X based on
Anderson's revised Bloom's taxonomy and skills Communication : Research in class X
IPA SMA N 1 Taraju Tasikmalaya.
Arikunto, S. (2018). Basics of Educational Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Asadin, TA (2021). Analysis competency test questions book school electronics (BSE) high
school biology based on Bloom's taxonomy revised by Anderson. Indonesian Journal
of Biology Education, 7(2), 215- 226. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/12
3456789/56484
Hasanah, U. (2017). Analysis implementation evaluation learning biology class X even
semester at SMAN Kota Blitar . Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 3(2), 89-98.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v7i1p39-46
Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1009
Juhanda, A. (2016). Analysis question level cognitive Bloom's Taxonomy Revised in Books
Electronic School (BSE) Biology High School. Journal Teaching Mathematics and
Science Natural Science, 21(1), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i1.36258
Marlen T, Fida R. (2022). Analysis Biology textbooks for grade X high school used in schools
For measure skills think critical students. BioEdu : Periodic Biology Education
Science, 11(2), 123-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v12n2.p414-431
Mulyasa , E. (2021). Development and Implementation Curriculum 2013. Bandung: Teenagers
Rosdakarya .
Nugraha, W. (2024). Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy and its objectives education as
well as its implementation in learning . Journal of Education, 10(1), 15-25.
Purwanto, N. (2020). Principles and Techniques of Evaluation Teaching . Bandung: Teenagers
Rosdakarya.
Qomariah, L., & Setiawan, ESR (2015). Analysis Contents Book Electronic School (BSE)
biology class XI semester 1 based on science literacy. Edusains, 7(1), 1-10. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i1.1403
Rahmawati, F., & Nugroho, SE (2021). Evaluation Skills Communication Student through Biology
Questions Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy in Class X Textbooks. Biosphere : Journal of
Biology Education, 13(1), 45-56.
Sabir, A. (2021). Analysis of LOTS and HOTS Problems Based on Bloom's Revised Anderson
Taxonomy in Biology Textbook. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(2), 145-156.
Sapitri, A., Kurniati, T., & Yuliawati, A. (2022). Analysis quality Biology final exam
questions for senior high school grades X and XI MIA. Bioeduca : Journal of Biology
Education, 4(1), 45-56. DOI:10.21580/ bioeduca.v 4i1.8433
Sari, AF, & Ulfa , SW (2022). Problems Analysis in High School Biology Textbooks Based
on Cognitive Domain of Bloom Taxonomy. Journal of Mathematics and Natural
Sciences Education, 23(3), 833- 843. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.p
p833-843
Setiawan, A. (2023). Evaluation of the Quality of Learning Questions: A Case Study on
Science Subjects in Junior High School. Journal of Educational Research: 6(1): 45-56.
Sudjana , N. (2019). Assessment of Learning Process Results Teaching . Bandung: Teenagers
Rosdakarya .
Utami, D. &. (2023). The Effect of HOTS Questions on Critical Thinking Ability in Biology
Materials. Journal of Science Education: 15(1): 125-134.
Widodo, A. (2006). Revision Bloom's Taxonomy and development grain question . Indonesian
Journal of Biology Education, 2(1), 17-25.
Zohar, A. &. (2023). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they
mutually exclusive? The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12(2): 145-181.