Mela Yayu Apriangi1, Hadiansah2, Epa Paujiah3
Analysis Of Biology Problems In Science Books Class X Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Of Anderson's Revision
And Communication Skills
Journal of Indonesian Impressions (JII) Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2025 1004
on the level of understanding basic, so that No push student For develop skills think critical
and communication. This is show the need update in compilation questions and evaluation
learning.
Urgency study This is also supported by the findings (Tony, 2021), which shows that
book school electronics (BSE) high school biology often No fulfil criteria level cognitive
Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy. While that, Hasanah (2017) highlighted that
implementation evaluation learning biology at Blitar City High School Still use approach less
traditional effective in increase competence students. Both studies This underline the need
more analysis deep For ensure that textbooks meet standard expected education.
Review literature show that implementation Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy in
textbooks have potential For increase quality learning. Juhanda, (2016) take notes that analysis
question based on level cognitive help teachers understand level difficulty appropriate question
with ability students. More Furthermore, Mulyasa (2021) emphasized importance
implementation The 2013 curriculum demands integration between competence cognitive and
skills communication. Therefore that, analysis This No only important For evaluate quality
textbooks, but also for increase effectiveness learning in a way overall.
Updates offered in study This is a more approach comprehensive in analyze question
biology based on Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy.Nugraha & Jamilah, (2024) mention
that revision This give clear guidance for educator in to design question that is not only test
knowledge factual, but also ability analytical and synthetic. With Thus, research This
contribute in provide a more comprehensive evaluation model relevant with need modern
education.
Based on existing references, Rahmawati and Nugroho (2021 ) highlighted importance
evaluation skills communication student through question biology based on Bloom's revised
taxonomy . This is relevant with findings Sapitri, Kurniati, and Yuliawati (2022), who showed
that that quality biology final exam questions often not reflect need student For think critical.
Sari and Ulfa (2022) also noted that Lots high school biology textbook failed measure skills
think critical student in a way adequate.
Under development evaluation education, Sudjana (2019) and Purwanto (2020)
emphasize importance principles and techniques development - oriented evaluation
competence students. Analysis This become base in compile instrument evaluation that is not
only measure results learning, but also supports a more comprehensive learning process.
holistic . Ulfa and Sari (2022) showed that analysis textbooks that focus on scientific literacy
can help increase quality learning biology at high school level.
Overall analysis This aiming For give a comprehensive overview about quality biology
textbook class X. With use Anderson's revised Bloom's Taxonomy as framework work,
research This expected can give solution on existing problems and support development
education more biology good in the future.
RESEARCH METHODS
This study uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive method, which aims to describe
a phenomenon or situation systematically, factually, and accurately. In this study, the
researcher analyzed LOTS (Lower Order Thinking Skills) and Higher Order Thinking Skills
(HOTS) questions in grade X science books on Biology material based on Bloom's revised
Bloom Taxonomy in categories C1 to C6, and analyzed the distribution of communication
skills development in manuscripts contained in grade X science books. This analysis was
carried out using the Bloom Taxonomy framework, where each question and manuscript in the
book was analyzed to identify and describe the form of LOTS and HOTS questions, and to
determine the development of students' communication skills objectively and systematically.