Police Duties and Functions in Realizing Justice and Legal Certainty
Under Police Law No. 2 Of 2002
Yoan Febriawan
Magister Manajemen Pendidikan USB YPKP Bandung,
Indonesia
|
Keywords |
Abstract |
|
Duties, Functions, Justice, Legal Certainty, Police |
The National Police of the Republic of Indonesia
(Polri) holds a crucial role in upholding security and public order
(Kamtibmas) as one of the key state institutions. Governed by Law Number 2 of
2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, this
research aims to scrutinize and assess the duties and functions assigned to
the police according to this legislation, with a focus on their ability to
achieve justice and legal certainty. Employing normative research methods,
this study relies on a literature review as its primary data collection
technique. The collected data undergoes analysis through three stages: data
reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings of this
research reveal that under Police Law No. 2 of 2002, the functions of the
police are outlined in Article 2. These functions encompass maintaining
security and public order, law enforcement, protection, and community
service, positioning the police as an integral part of state governance.
Additionally, Article 13 delineates the primary duties of the police,
emphasizing their responsibility in maintaining security and public order,
enforcing laws, and offering protection, guidance, and service to the
community. |
Corresponding Author: Yoan
Febriawan
Email: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
The National Police of the Republic of Indonesia
(Polri) is an institution that functions as a state instrument with a primary
role in maintaining security and public order. The National Police is tasked
with enforcing the law, ensuring that laws are applied fairly and evenly
throughout Indonesia. Apart from that, the National Police also has the
responsibility to provide protection, guidance and service to the community.
This task involves various activities, ranging from routine patrols, handling
crime, to providing assistance and public services in various situations. All
of these functions and tasks are carried out with the main aim of maintaining
domestic security so that people can live safely and peacefully (Baldwin, 2018).
In Article 1 of Police Law No. 2 of 2002, security
and public order are described as a constantly evolving state within society,
deemed essential for the advancement of the national development process to
realize overarching national objectives. This state is defined by the assurance
of security, the preservation of order, the enforcement of laws, and the
sustenance of tranquility. It encompasses the capacity to nurture and enhance
societal potential and resilience, enabling the prevention and mitigation of
various forms of legal infractions and disturbances that may disrupt societal
harmony.
The National Police of the Republic of Indonesia
has limitations in terms of the number of personnel, availability of equipment
and operational budget. Therefore, active participation from the community is
needed in creating security and public order. In the context of the duty and
role of the state to protect all its citizens, every government in the world is
expected to provide civil services, public services and strengthen community
empowerment through various policies (Arif, 2021). The
National Police has duties and functions regulated in Law Number 2 of 2002
concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia.
Previous research by (Pandelaki, 2018) found that the implementation
of law enforcement by law enforcement officials is based on applicable legal
norms/rules to ensure legal certainty and justice for the community or for
justice seekers. Police professionalism is measurable and able to guarantee
security, public order in carrying out crowd control/demonstration activities,
able to control themselves from violence and restrain emotions by providing
training, socialization in dealing with demonstrators/demonstrators, and
understanding of laws and regulations.
Another research by (Ranofika, Yayuk, & Nurmasanti, 2023) found that the implementation of special police in
the perspective of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the
Republic of Indonesia can be said to have created a legal framework that
provides a strong foundation for coaching, monitoring and enforcing discipline
against the police. special. However, various efforts must also continue to be
made to ensure compatibility between the implementation of special police and
the legal objectives to be achieved. If the special police do not carry out the
technical guidance instructions given by the Police, this is permissible. This
is because the main task of the Indonesian National Police is to coordinate,
supervise and provide technical guidance to the special police.
This research can contribute to law enforcement
theory by enriching understanding of the implementation of Police Law no. 2 of
2002 in realizing justice and legal certainty. The findings of this research
can be a basis for further research in the field of law enforcement and
policing, both theoretically and practically. Further research could explore
certain aspects not covered in this study or test the impact of implementing
the resulting recommendations. The aim of this research is to identify and
analyze the duties and functions of the police as regulated in Police Law no. 2
of 2002 and to evaluate the extent to which the police can realize justice and
legal certainty based on these regulations.
RESEARCH
METHODS
This study employs normative research methods,
commonly referred to as library research, which delve into document analysis.
Utilizing various secondary data sources like statutory regulations, court
decisions, legal theories, and expert opinions, this research seeks to
understand legal phenomena. The primary data collection technique employed is
literature study, which entails gathering information from diverse library sources,
reading and recording pertinent details, and organizing research materials. The
collected data undergoes three main stages of analysis. Firstly, data reduction
involves simplifying and selecting relevant information aligned with the
research focus. Secondly, data presentation entails organizing the reduced data
systematically for easy comprehension and further analysis. Finally,
conclusions are drawn by interpreting the presented data, determining its
significance, and formulating final conclusions that support the research
objectives.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
The function of
law, both as a rule and as a guide to behavior, is to direct human behavior.
The influence of law is not only limited to compliance with regulations, but
also includes the overall impact of law on human behavior, both positive and
negative (Arif, 2021). Justice and
legal certainty are two important aspects that support the stability and
prosperity of a country. Justice lexically means equality or the act of
equalizing. According to the general view, justice is maintaining individual
rights. The definition of justice is giving rights to people who are entitled
to receive them. Justice is a benchmark for the validity of an order in the
life of the nation, society and state (Pandit, 2016).
Referring to
the theory of legal certainty put forward by M. Yahya
Harahap and Satjipto Rahardjo, the legal certainty in question is certainty
regarding regulations that must first be submitted. Regulations regarding land
acquisition for special flats must be explicitly stated in the PTUP Law. If the
regulations are clear, citizens will know what they can and cannot do, so they
can control arbitrary government actions (Rahmawati, 2024).
Achieving legal
certainty entails ensuring that legal principles align with societal needs. Legal
regulations that are rooted in and reflect societal norms contribute to real
legal certainty, fostering harmony between the state and its citizens in their
understanding and orientation toward the legal framework (Komeni & Widjajanti, 2024).
The pursuit of
justice and legal certainty is manifested through policy implementations such
as Police Law No. 2 of 2022 and Republic of Indonesia State Police Regulation
Number 2 of 2022, which amends Regulation of the Head of the Republic of
Indonesia State Police Number 15 of 2017 concerning the Determination of Level
and Class Status Disabilities of Civil Servants in the National Police of the
Republic of Indonesia (Syamsuddin, Saleng, Aburaera, & Muchtar, 2018).
The reform of
Indonesian Police Law, Law Number 2 of 2002, aims to fortify the National
Police's position and role within government functions (Mukhtaroma, 2023). These
functions include maintaining security and public order, law enforcement, and
providing protection and services to the community while upholding human
rights. The National Police are mandated to operate autonomously, free from
influence by any entity, including governmental or external forces (Arif, 2021).
The National
Police as a law enforcement agency has a major responsibility in carrying out
various functions, such as law enforcement, maintaining security and public
order, as well as protecting, protecting and serving the community, by
upholding the principles of human rights. The National Police is expected to be
able to adapt quickly to dynamic societal developments, including phenomena
such as the supremacy of law, human rights, globalization, democratization,
decentralization, transparency and accountability.
The role and function of the Indonesian National
Police (Polri) has always been the subject of debate
in political and societal interests (Siregar, 2019). The National
Police, like the police in any country, is often in a challenging situation
because it has to balance the interests of power and the needs of society. A
country's police system is greatly influenced by the political system and
social control implemented. Through Government Decree No. 11/S.D., the National
Police changed its status to become a separate department under the direct
control of the Prime Minister. This makes the National Police have an equal
position with departments and the Head of the National Police of the Republic
of Indonesia (Kapolri) is equivalent to the Minister (Sugiharto & Sunarya, 2023). The main
duties of the Indonesian National Police, in accordance with Article 13 of Law
Number 2 of 2002, include three main things, namely:
a.
Maintain public security and order;
b.
Enforcing the law; And
c.
Providing protection, protection and service to public.
In article 3, the police function is the National
Police of the Republic of Indonesia, assisted by:
a.
special police force;
b.
civil servant investigators; and/or
c.
Forms of self-protection.
Carrying out
police functions as intended in paragraph (1) letters a, b and c, carries out
police functions in accordance with the laws and regulations which form the
basis of their respective laws.
Furthermore,
Article 14 of Law no. 2 of 2002 explains in more detail several duties of the
Indonesian National Police, including: carrying out regulation, guarding,
escorting and patrolling community and government activities as needed; as well
as carrying out all activities to ensure security, order and smooth traffic on
the roads.
There are two
elements that influence police duties, namely the element of danger and the
element of authority, including the authority to commit acts of violence or discretion(Triadi & Ardian, 2024). The element
of danger makes the police always alert, while the element of authority can at
any time turn into arbitrariness. The police as law enforcers have a role as
investigators in the criminal justice system, aim to find suspects in a
criminal case so that clarity about the case is revealed. This law enforcement
is intended so that every action that violates legal rules and regulations can
be controlled, so that people's lives become safe, peaceful and remain within
the limits of community tolerance (Suntaka, 2018).
To fulfill the
duties of the Police effectively, it is essential to adhere to the delineation
of primary responsibilities and powers of the Indonesian National Police, as
outlined in Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of
Indonesia. According to Article 2 of this legislation, the Police function
constitutes a vital aspect of state governance, encompassing the maintenance of
public security and order, law enforcement, as well as the provision of
protection and service to the community. Additionally, Article 3 elucidates
that the execution of Police functions is conducted by the National Police of
the Republic of Indonesia, with support from specialized police units, civilian
personnel, and/or independent security entities. The implementation of Police
functions, as stipulated in Article 3(2), underscores adherence to legal
regulations as the foundation guiding their respective mandates. This
underscores the pivotal role of the rule of law in guiding the execution of
duties and authority by the Indonesian Police force.
Articles 15 and 16 in the Indonesian Police Law detail
the duties and authority of the Indonesian Police, while Article 18 regulates
Police discretion which is based on the Police Code of Ethics. Based on the
formulation of functions, main duties and authority of the National Police as
regulated in Law no. 2 of 2002, the main functions of the police can be
categorized as follows:
1.
Community Development Tasks (Pre-emptive)
2.
All endeavors and community development initiatives
aim to enhance community involvement and awareness of laws and regulations. The
role of the National Police in this realm is termed Community Policing, which
adopts a sociable approach to society and fosters reciprocal relationships to
attain this objective. However, the current application of the Community
Policing concept tends to exhibit partiality in its execution at police
stations. As previously mentioned, when examining foreign police systems, it's
essential to account for the societal traits of the populace. In Indonesia, the
concept of Community Policing already aligns with local character and culture
(e.g., in Java), which is implemented through a village-based environmental
security system. Here, communities take turns assuming responsibility for the
security of their respective areas, supported by the activities of Bhabinkamtibmas, who consistently monitor their designated
zones and engage in specialized activities.
3.
Duties in the Preventive Field
All efforts and
activities in the field of preventive policing aim to maintain public security
and order, as well as protect the safety of people, objects and goods,
including providing protection and assistance, especially to prevent law
violations. In carrying out this task, professional skills and special
techniques are required, such as patrolling, guarding, escorting and
organizing.
4.
Duties in the Repressive Field
In the field of repression, there
are two types of roles and functions of the Indonesian National Police, namely
judicial repressive and non-judicial. UU no. 2 of 2002 gives the National
Police the role of carrying out non-judicial repressive actions related to
Article 18 paragraph 1, namely "police discretionary" authority which
generally concerns minor cases.
The
implementation of law enforcement by the National Police is significantly
affected by various hindering factors associated with the circumstances and
situations prevailing within local communities. Law enforcement endeavors to
translate ideals of justice, legal certainty, and societal welfare into
tangible outcomes. Thus, law enforcement fundamentally constitutes a process of
actualizing these ideals. As per Soerjono Soekanto, law enforcement involves the synchronization of
values encapsulated in firm principles or perspectives and expressed through
actionable attitudes, serving as the ultimate phase in the realization of
values to establish, preserve, and uphold harmony in social interactions (Ningrum, 2020).
In law
enforcement practices, the Police face various obstacles, both operational and
legal procedural, which hinder efforts to reduce the increase in crime rates
and often produce suboptimal results. These obstacles are related to the model
of approach used, which requires support from the professionalism, mentality
and education of members of the National Police. Efforts to understand the obstacles
faced by the police in carrying out their roles and functions, including by the
Community Police (Polmas), need to consider several
general factors that influence the law enforcement process, namely:
a.
The legal factor itself;
b.
Law enforcement factors, namely the parties who form
and implement the law;
c.
Facilities or facility factors;
d.
Community factors, namely the environment in which the
law applies or is applied;
e.
Cultural factors, namely the results of work,
creativity, and sense of community.
Law enforcement
throughout the world requires the presence of the police to represent the state
in implementing and maintaining the implementation of the law in all sectors of
society. There is no country without police, although their duties and
functions vary from one country to another. For example, in the United States,
the police serve and function as state police and are not directly related to
the central government. The police structure in the United States consists of
three levels: federal, state, and local. The constitution does not provide for
a centralized form of policing, so it is local and state governments that carry
out full police functions. To deal with special crimes such as sabotage,
spying, and others, federal police such as the FBI, US DEA, US Marshal, US
Attorney General, and US Secret Service are responsible. In the United States,
the police are under the department, not directly under the president as in
Indonesia (Anshar & Setiyono, 2020).
CONCLUSION
In the
Indonesian Police Law No. 2 of 2002, the role of the police force is
delineated. Article 2 stipulates that the police constitute one of the
essential functions of the state government, encompassing the maintenance of
public security and order, law enforcement, as well as the provision of
protection, guidance, and assistance to the community. Article 3 elaborates
that the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia, with the assistance of
specialized police units, civilian personnel, and other forms of auxiliary
security, is entrusted with the execution of police functions in accordance
with the legal regulations underpinning their respective mandates. The primary
obligations of the police force are outlined in Article 13, encompassing the
preservation of public security and order, law enforcement, and the provision
of protection, care, and services to the community. Further specifications
regarding police duties are delineated in Article 14 of the Indonesian Police Law.
REFERENCES
Anshar, Ryanto Ulil, & Setiyono, Joko.
(2020). Tugas dan Fungsi Polisi sebagai penegak hukum dalam Perspektif
Pancasila. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 359�372.
Arif, Muhammad.
(2021). Tugas dan fungsi kepolisian dalam perannya sebagai penegak hukum
menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang kepolisian. Al-Adl: Jurnal
Hukum, 13(1), 91�101.
Baldwin, David A.
(2018). The concept of security. In National and International Security
(pp. 41�62). Routledge.
Komeni, Wirdi Hisroh,
& Widjajanti, Ermania. (2024). Ketidaktepatan Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat
dalam Pasal 2 KUHP Baru: Prespektif Teori Kepastian Hukum. Innovative:
Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 1051�1059.
Mukhtaroma, Nadya
Binti. (2023). Supervisison of Police Duties And Authorities Based On Law
Number 2 of 2002 on The State Police of Republic of Indonesia in Siyasah
Dusturiyah Perspective. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Ningrum, Putu Ary
Prasetya. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengancaman
Yang Ditujukkan Dengan Ucapan Dan Hinaan. Pariksa: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu,
4(1), 39�45.
Pandelaki, Glenn
Richard. (2018). Peran Polisi Dalam Pengendalian Massa Berdasarkan
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lex
Et Societatis, 6(5).
Pandit, I. Gde
Suranaya. (2016). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Persepsi Bioetika Administrasi Publik. Public
Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 14�20.
Rahmawati, Debrina.
(2024). Pengaturan Hukum Terkait Penggunaan Telepon pada Penagihan Peer to Peer
Lending. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 212�230.
Ranofika, Fery, Yayuk,
Yayuk, & Nurmasanti, Susi. (2023). Implementasi Tugas Kepolisian Khusus
Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik
Indonesia. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 6(3),
588�603.
Siregar, Sarah.
(2019). Indonesian National Police in Terrorism Handling Policy During Joko
Widodo�s Government: Analysis of Role, Function and Evaluation. International
Conference on Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019), 93�98.
Atlantis Press.
Sugiharto, Agus, &
Sunarya, Ar. (2023). Implementasi Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 22 Tahun 2010 Tentang
Fungsi Dan Peran Sentra Pelayanan Kepolisian Terpadu Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19
(Studi Analisis Di Polsek Dawarblandong Kabupaten Mojokerto). Soetomo
Magister Ilmu Administrasi, 807�820.
Suntaka, Agung Tri
Utomo. (2018). Diskresi Tugas Kepolisian Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana
Narkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara
Republik Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 6(10).
Syamsuddin, Rahman,
Saleng, Abrar, Aburaera, Sukarno, & Muchtar, Syamsuddin. (2018). Review of
Court Decision after the Constitutional Court of Indonesia Decision in Legal
Certainty and Justice Perspectives. JL Pol�y & Globalization, 69,
192.
Triadi, Irwan, &
Ardian, Muhammad Fadhil. (2024). TNI AL Authority as Maritime Crime
Investigator in Securing Indonesian Waters. Rechtsvinding, 2(1),
11�24.